Quote of the Indeterminate Time Interval – Brett Kavanaugh

by wfgodbold

Countdown to froth-mouthed anti-gunners ranting about how speech is different from guns in 3, 2, 1 …

A ban on a class of arms is not an “incidental” regulation. It is equivalent to a ban on a category of speech. Such restrictions on core enumerated constitutional protections are not subjected to mere intermediate scrutiny review. The majority opinion here is in uncharted territory in suggesting that intermediate scrutiny can apply to an outright ban on possession of a class of weapons that have not traditionally been banned.

That’s DC circuit judge Brett Kavanaugh, writing in his dissent from the recent ruling on Heller’s lawsuit regarding several problems with DC’s post-Heller firearms registration regulations (the consensus is that he tried to shoehorn too much into the suit instead of taking a more incremental approach).

It’s not just gunbloggers that analogize restrictions on the RKBA to restrictions on speech; now it’s federal judges, too.

Let the PSH commence!

H/T: Sebastian.

Advertisements

2 Comments to “Quote of the Indeterminate Time Interval – Brett Kavanaugh”

  1. If a ban on semi-automatic, magazine-fed rifles is considered to be Constitutionally-acceptable, then there is no reason that a ban on automatically-posting, queue-fed websites (otherwise known as “weblogs”) would not also be acceptable.

    Why this is such a hard concept for some people to grasp, I will never understand…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: