What is second degree murder in Florida, anyway?*

by wfgodbold

Well, under F.S.A. § 782.04 (2), second degree murder is:

(2) The unlawful killing of a human being, when perpetrated by any act imminently dangerous to another and evincing a depraved mind regardless of human life, although without any premeditated design to effect the death of any particular individual, is murder in the second degree and constitutes a felony of the first degree, punishable by imprisonment for a term of years not exceeding life or as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

Fla. Stat. Ann. § 782.04 (West).

In some jurisdictions, this is know as the depraved-heart murder.

Second degree murder in Florida has three elements that have to be met; it’s an unlawful killing that:

is characterized by “an act or series of acts that: (1) a person of ordinary judgment would know is reasonably certain to kill or do serious bodily injury to another, and (2) is done from ill will, hatred, spite or an evil intent, and (3) is of such a nature that the act itself indicates an indifference to human life.

State v. Montgomery, 39 So. 3d 252, 255-56 (Fla. 2010).

This makes it look like Angela Corey is putting all her second degree murder eggs in the racism basket; if she can’t prove racism, I don’t know how she’s going to meet that second element.

Florida also only has one manslaughter statute, F.S.A. § 782.07 (1):

(1) The killing of a human being by the act, procurement, or culpable negligence of another, without lawful justification according to the provisions of chapter 776 and in cases in which such killing shall not be excusable homicide or murder, according to the provisions of this chapter, is manslaughter, a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

Fla. Stat. Ann. § 782.07 (West).

Manslaughter is a lesser-included offense to second degree murder. State v. Montgomery, 39 So. 3d 252, 259 (Fla. 2010). This is more broad; if someone dies as a result of another’s act, procurement, or culpable negligence, and it’s not justified or excusable, it’s manslaughter. Zimmerman acted, Martin died as a result of that act; if Zimmerman wasn’t justified under a self-defense doctrine, he’s going to be guilty of manslaughter.

Basically, Corey’s decision to go for second degree murder lets her fall back on manslaughter if she can’t meet the elements required for the more serious charge. It also gives the jury the option to convict Zimmerman of the lesser charge if they decide that is more appropriate.

Of course, Corey has to meet the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard when she attempts to prove either second degree murder or manslaughter; Zimmerman merely has to prove his affirmative defense by a “preponderance of the evidence” standard.

If Zimmerman can show that it’s more likely than not he acted in self-defense, then it doesn’t matter what Corey can prove. If he acted in self-defense, then the killing was justified, and Zimmerman is immune from criminal and civil actions.

*This started out as a response to one of Weerd’s comments on the charging of Zimmerman, and quickly got out of hand.

Advertisements

2 Comments to “What is second degree murder in Florida, anyway?*”

  1. Regardless of what Shaffer, the television analyst says: Zimmerman is basically finished insofar as a “stand-your-ground” of “self defense” is concerned. The problem for Zimmerman is that he had a “safe haven” when he contacted the police via his cellphone. Indeed, that “safe haven was his automobile” that he was in and obseving Martin from. Martin had taken no threatening actions at Zimmerman while the latter was in his automobile and, in fact, had long passed and was obviously moving away from the vehicle. Thus, Zimmerman was in no danger while he was in the vehicle and could easily have remained there or even driven away, remaining in relative safety. However, the evidence will attest that Zimmerman left his vehicle (that kills the I was in fear for my life” factor). He next moves towards Martin on foot (that kills the I was standing my ground and cornered factor). Zimmerman is being mislead to try and imply that the stand YOUR GROUND law means that the YOUR GROUND part of the law is portable. You simply cannot place yourself in danger by going to the alleged dangerous area or situation and then also claim “I was in fear and cornered and stood my ground’). Zimmerman’s safe GROUND on that fateful night was his damn vehicle, and unfortunately, he elected to leave it. What will finally do him in at trial will be: 1) The position of the vehicle at the time of the shooting; 2) the position where Martin was shot at; 3) the telephone logs from Zimmerman’s phone, Martin’s phone, the phone of Martin’s girlfriend, and the all the 911 calls which were made just prior to, during and after the shooting. There are early indications that such evidence will destroy Zimmerman’s credibility by proving that he, in fact place himself in danger. Remember, YOUR GROUND is not portable!

  2. There’s no proof he wasn’t already moving back toward his car when Trayvon attacked him. There’s no requirement you have to run away in your own neighborhood. In fact backing away slowly is safer than turning your back and running. Looks to me like major overcharging. Forced up the DA by public opinion, some of it actual racism. Tough to find any black folks even mentioning a fair trial much less supporting the Hispanic-Jew, who is painted as lily white to add even MORE racial difference into the equation. The day you can do 25 for getting out of your vehicle is the day criminals have won the street.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: